Skip to content
Personal information

Ten years later: How the PCA sentencing changed food safety justice — or didn’t

Ten years later: How the PCA sentencing changed food safety justice — or didn’t
Published:

This is Part I of a three-part series marking the 10th anniversary of the historic sentencing in the Peanut Corporation of America (PCA) criminal case.

Witness to Justice

Ten years ago, on Sept. 21, 2015, I sat in a federal courtroom in Albany, GA, to witness what many believed would be a turning point in food safety history.

It was the sentencing phase of the criminal trial against executives of the Peanut Corporation of America (PCA)—a company whose negligence during the 2008–2009 Salmonella Typhimurium outbreak caused 714 confirmed illnesses, an estimated 22,000 unreported cases, and at least nine deaths, according to the CDC.

I wasn’t just there as a professor of food policy and regulatory affairs. I was there as a father of Riley Detwiler, who died in the 1993 Jack in the Box E. coli outbreak. That outbreak killed four children and sickened hundreds, yet no criminal charges were ever filed, despite clear admissions of wrongdoing. That absence of justice has haunted food safety advocates for decades.

The PCA sentencing was different. It was, for many of us, a long-overdue moment of justice — and accountability.

So when Judge W. Louis Sands entered that Georgia courtroom and began the sentencing of Stewart Parnell, former PCA CEO; Michael Parnell, peanut broker; and Mary Wilkerson, quality assurance manager, it was more than a legal proceeding: it was a moment of reckoning for an entire industry.

A Historic Case with a Human Toll

The 2008–2009 Salmonella Typhimurium outbreak tied to PCA’s products led to 714 confirmed illnesses across 46 states and at least nine deaths, with the CDC estimating over 22,000 additional unreported cases. In my 2015 article, Bearing Witness to Justice at the PCA Sentencing, I recalled the haunting testimonies from family members:

These were not rhetorical flourishes. These were testimonies of preventable death, caused by decisions made in corporate boardrooms.

The Whistleblower Who Spoke Up

Much of this case may never have reached prosecution without Kenneth Kendrick, a former assistant manager at PCA’s facility in Plainview, TX.

Kendrick had reported rat infestations, water leaks, and unsanitary conditions as early as 2006 — long before the outbreak. He was ignored by both state regulators and corporate leadership. His story, which I shared in Praise for an Unlikely Whistleblower, highlighted a second, unregistered PCA plant operating without oversight in Texas.

It was only through the advocacy group STOP Foodborne Illness that Kendrick’s information made it to FDA investigators and the press. His role proved pivotal in revealing systemic fraud and failures at PCA.

The sentences that shocked an industry

Judge Sands was unequivocal: “These acts were driven by profit and the protection of profit… thus greed.”

These weren’t just regulatory violations. They were federal crimes, prosecuted by the Department of Justice under laws that had long gone unused — including the Park Doctrine, which allows for criminal liability of corporate officers in public health cases even without direct knowledge.

A Case Study in What Accountability Could Look Like

In PCA Does Not Reflect All in the Food Industry, I emphasized that most companies strive to do the right thing—they invest in prevention, training, and transparency. Following the deadly 2006 spinach outbreak, for example, California farmers voluntarily formed the Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement (LGMA), a program hailed for advancing industry standards.

PCA was the opposite: a case of deliberate fraud, falsified lab results, and ignored safety red flags.

And while it was a moment of justice, it would later become clear that the case was more exception than rule.

Why This Still Matters, Ten Years On

For families like mine, the pain never fully recedes. The empty chairs at dinner tables don’t go away.

This anniversary isn’t about reliving the tragedy. It’s about recognizing what we’ve failed to do since: turn this moment into momentum for lasting change.

Despite PCA’s sentencing, outbreaks continue. So do corporate cover-ups. So do deaths.

If justice only arrives when cameras are rolling, or when a whistleblower defies the odds, then it’s not justice: it’s luck.

We can and must do better.

The PCA case proved that food safety negligence can carry criminal consequences. The real question is why so few cases since have followed its lead.

Coming in Part II: How the PCA case shaped food safety regulation, corporate compliance, and criminal liability in the decade that followed.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here)

Darin Detwiler

Darin Detwiler

Darin Detwiler, founder and president of Detwiler Consulting Group, LLC, is the director of the MS in Regulatory Affairs of Food and Food Industry and Professor of Food Policy at Northeastern University in Boston. In addition to serving as the execut

All articles

More in Food Policy & Law

See all

More from Darin Detwiler

See all
Your Support Protects Public Health

Food Safety News is nonprofit and reader-funded. Your gift ensures critical coverage of outbreaks, recalls, and regulations remains free for everyone.